One Reddit user suggests that – in France at least – Samsung is about to take drastic action
The Note 7 exploding battery saga rumbles on. Picking up where we left off last week when the FAA strongly recommended people don’t use the handset on flights and the US government advised people stop using the handset until replaced, this week begins with two more horror stories.
First up, a Florida man’s Jeep caught fire after a Note 7 was left charging on the dashboard. The story gets worse when you read further and find that his eight year-old daughter was about to get into the car. You might think that nearly injuring a child is as bad as the Note 7’s troubled launch can get, until you realise that the second story actually involved that nightmare scenario.
A six year-old boy was said to be playing with the Note 7, before it burst into flames as he was watching videos at his Brooklyn. He was treated for burns at Downstate Medical Center, and is back home, but understandably terrified of smartphones now. ““He doesn’t want to see or go near any phones. He’s been crying to his mother,” the boy’s grandmother told the New York Post.
As we reported earlier, Samsung is offering a free exchange of all Note 7 handsets sold, but given it’s a voluntary action on the owner’s part, what can Samsung do to end the steady stream of exploding battery news? Some insight may come from a French Reddit user who claims that – in France at least – Samsung will begin remotely deactivating early Note 7 devices from 30 September.
That would be a heavy-handed solution, but it would at least force complacent owners to follow the company’s sensible safety procedure. However uncomfortable the concept of a company remotely deactivating your devices might make you feel, on this occasion, you feel that if it’s an option the company can take, they’d be irresponsible not to consider it.
Thank you for your visit on this page Samsung reportedly deactivating rogue Note 7s as more horror stories emerge